James v. Varreen et al, No. 2:2013cv00037 - Document 77 (N.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 10/27/2016. (YMB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
James v. Varreen et al Doc. 77 FILED 2016 Oct-27 AM 08:33 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CURLEY EMANUEL JAMES, Plaintiff, v. ASSISTANT WARDEN A. W. VEREEN et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action Number 2:13-cv-00037-AKK-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on July 11, 2016, recommending the defendants’ special reports be treated as motions for summary judgment and further recommending that the motions be granted. Doc. 72. The court advised the parties of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days. Id. at 36. The plaintiff requested and received two extensions of time to file his objections, see docs. 73; 74; 75; 76, but failed to file any objections within the time periods allotted. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s report is due to be ADOPTED, and the recommendation ACCEPTED. Consequently, the defendants’ motions for Dockets.Justia.com summary judgment are due to be GRANTED. The court will contemporaneously enter an order of final judgment in accordance with the foregoing. DONE the 27th day of October, 2016. _________________________________ ABDUL K. KALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
