Howard v. Patterson et al, No. 2:2012cv04185 - Document 16 (N.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with memorandum opinion, the petition for writ habeas corpus in this action is DENIED and this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/27/14. (ASL)

Download PDF
Howard v. Patterson et al Doc. 16 FILED 2014 Aug-27 PM 02:55 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL LAMAR HOWARD, Petitioner v. TONY PATTERSON, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-04185-JFG-HGD FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith and Rule 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action is due to be and hereby is DENIED and this action DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2014. MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Page 1 of 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.