Harris v. USAA Federal Savings Bank et al, No. 2:2012cv03780 - Document 10 (N.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 12/17/12. (KGE, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED 2012 Dec-17 AM 11:30 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID HARRIS, III, } } Plaintiff } } v. } } USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, et } al., } } Defendants. } CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-AR-3780-S MEMORANDUM OPINION By order entered on November 28, 2012, this court set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m., December 14, 2012, the separate motions to dismiss filed by defendants, USAA Federal Savings Bank, and U.S. Bancorp. Plaintiff, David Harris, III, pro se, was notified of the hearing. When the motions were called at 10:05 a.m., December 14, 2012, Harris did not appear. Counsel for both defendants did appear in support of defendants motions. The court has considered the motions and submitted in support of and in opposition to them. the materials The court finds that the motions are well taken, and are due to be granted. Neither of the papers filed by plaintiff on November 26, 2012, comes close to getting around the pleading requirements of Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, or Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, or demonstrates that the matters complained of are within the protection either of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or The Service Members Civil Relief Act, the statutes invoked by Harris. It is hard for a court to deny relief to a pro se plaintiff who, without any legal training, has obviously tried his best. The court doubts that a good lawyer could have helped him in this case on the facts he alleges. counterclaim for a Because neither defendant filed a deficiency, defendants are precluded from claiming a deficiency if there is a gap between what was recovered at the foreclosure sale, and what Harris owed. The motions to dismiss will be granted by separate order. DONE this 17th day of December, 2012. _____________________________ WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
