Mitchell v. United States of America, No. 2:2011cv08013 - Document 12 (N.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judges findings are due to be and are hereby are ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DENIED. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 12/10/2013. (MSN)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED 2013 Dec-10 PM 02:32 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION BOBBY EUGENE MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-8013-LSC-JHE MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on November 1, 2013 (Doc. # 9), recommending that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255, be DENIED. The parties were allowed an opportunity to file objections. Despite the fact that the magistrate judge granted (Doc. # 11) the petitioner s motion for an extension of time to object (Doc. # 10), no objections have been received from either party. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge s findings are due to be and are hereby are ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DENIED. A Final Judgment will be entered. As to the foregoing it is SO ORDERED this the 10th day of December, 2013. L. SCOTT COOGLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 174256 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
