Puryear v. North Courtland Police Dept. et al, No. 2:2011cv02600 - Document 39 (N.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER-re:R&R 38 . The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is ORDERED that the dft's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 9/26/2013. (AVC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED 2013 Sep-26 AM 09:18 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CARL EDWARD PURYEAR, Plaintiff, vs. OFFICER BRANDON SHANE MUNDY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-02600-RBP-JEO MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER The magistrate judge filed a report on August 30, 2013, recommending that the defendant s special report be treated as a motion for summary judgment and, as such, that it be denied. Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, there has been no response to the report and recommendation. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2013. ROBERT B. PROPST SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
