George v. Headley et al, No. 1:2015cv00308 - Document 7 (N.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION as more fully set out therein. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 9/30/2016. (AHI)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
George v. Headley et al Doc. 7 FILED 2016 Sep-30 PM 03:20 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL WAYNE GEORGE, Plaintiff, vs. WARDEN JOSEPH HEADLEY, et al., ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 1:15-cv-00308-CLS-SGC ) ) ) ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge entered a report on June 3, 2016, recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 6). Although the magistrate judge advised plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge, and ACCEPTS the recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), plaintiff’s federal claims are due to be dismissed without 1 Dockets.Justia.com prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Additionally, plaintiff’s state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). A separate order of final judgment will be entered. DONE this 30th day of September, 2016. ______________________________ United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
