Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3), No. 3:2021cv00737 - Document 23 (M.D. Ala. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 21 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) The 1 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/17/2022. (bes, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 23 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TERRY JAMES BUCHANON II, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA BUREAU OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21cv737-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking a release from incarceration after the revocation of his state parole. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that motion for preliminary injunction be denied. no objections to the recommendation. plaintiff’s There are Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: Dockets.Justia.com (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 17th day of August, 2022. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
