Pfeifer v. Smith et al (MAG+), No. 3:2020cv00282 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/29/2020. (bes, ) (Main Document 14 replaced on 9/29/2020 to attach a corrected PDF document to correct a typographical error that was contained within the originally filed PDF) (bes, ). Modified on 9/29/2020 (bes, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pfeifer v. Smith et al (MAG+) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DERYKE M. PFEIFER, SR., Plaintiff, v. JUDGE STUART K. SMITH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:20-cv-282-ECM (WO) OPINION and ORDER On August 17, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 9) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 29th day of September, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
