Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 3:2020cv00079 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/13/2020. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION STEPHEN HOWARD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20cv79-MHT (WO) OPINION This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner’s “Motion to Vacate Judgement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6),” which is a successive motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the required permission for a successive motion has not been obtained Appeals. from There recommendation. review of the the Eleventh are After record, no an the Circuit objections independent court and concludes Court of to the de novo that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. Dockets.Justia.com An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 13th day of March, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
