Long v. Richie et al (INMATE 3), No. 3:2019cv00507 - Document 28 (M.D. Ala. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 23 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED as time-barred and filed after the expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 4/22/2022. (am, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Long v. Richie et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL LONG, #165528, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. PATRICE RICHIE, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:19-cv-507-ECM (WO) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On February 22, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that the Petitioner’s habeas petition be dismissed as time-barred (doc. 23) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file, upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED as time-barred and filed after the expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Done this 22nd day of April, 2022. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
