Pippins v. Saul (CONSENT), No. 3:2018cv00943 - Document 24 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that co sts be and are hereby taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 5/10/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pippins v. Saul (CONSENT) Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DIANE PIPPINS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:18-cv-943-JTA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs be and are hereby taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Andrew Saul is the current Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul is substituted for Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, as the defendant in this lawsuit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this lawsuit pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to take the appropriate steps to reflect this change on the docket sheet. Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 10th day of May, 2021. JERUSHA T. ADAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
