Le v. Donghee Alabama LLC et al (CONSENT), No. 3:2016cv00361 - Document 21 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED that the defendants' partial motion to dismiss (doc. # 12 ) be and is hereby GRANTED, defendant Donghee America, Inc. be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as a defendant in this matter, and count four of the complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/1/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
Le v. Donghee Alabama LLC et al (CONSENT) Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ESTHER LE, Plaintiff, v. DONGHEE ALABAMA, LLC and DONGHEE AMERICA, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:16cv361-CSC MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On July 13, 2015, the defendants filed a partial motion to dismiss (doc. # 12) seeking the dismissal of defendant Donghee America, Inc. The defendants also seek dismissal of court four of the complaint, the state law breach of contract claim. On July 22, 2016, the plaintiff filed a response in which she states that she did not oppose the dismissal of defendant Donghee America, Inc. or count four, the state law breach of contract claim. See Doc. # 17. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and M.D. Ala. LR 73.1, the parties have consented to the United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings in this case and ordering the entry of final judgment. Accordingly, upon consideration of the partial motion to dismiss, and the plaintiff’s response, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (doc. # 12) be and is hereby GRANTED, defendant Donghee America, Inc. be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as a defendant in this matter, and count four of the complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Done this 1st day of August, 2016. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.