Corley v. Prentiss Griffith Detention Center et al (INMATE 2), No. 3:2015cv00165 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) the re 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) plf's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied; (3) this case is referred back to the US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/5/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Corley v. Prentiss Griffith Detention Center et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 12 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION HERMAN RICHARD CORLEY, JR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PRENTISS GRIFFITH DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv165-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the motion for preliminary injunction be denied. There recommendation. review of magistrate the are no objections to the After an independent and de novo record, judge’s the court concludes recommendation should that be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: Dockets.Justia.com (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 1-3) is denied. (3) This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 5th day of May, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
