Nunn v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 3:2013cv00341 - Document 13 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is adopted. (2) The Rule 35(a) motion (doc. no. 11) is denied. (3) The petitions for writ of habeas corpus (doc. nos. 1 & 3 ) are denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/2/2013. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn, )

Download PDF
Nunn v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 13 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TYRONE NUNN, SR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13cv341-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is adopted. (2) The Rule 35(a) motion (doc. no. 11) is denied. (3) The petitions for writ of habeas corpus (doc. nos. 1 & 3) are denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 2nd day of October, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.