McKeen v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al, No. 3:2011cv00980 - Document 46 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, pursuant to the 32 Notice of Dismissal, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, and the claims against it, are dismissed without prejudice, as furt her set out; The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP; Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, is terminated as a main defendant; Said party is still in this case as a crossclaim defendant. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/6/12. (scn, )

Download PDF
McKeen v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al Doc. 46 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TIFFANY McKEEN, ) Individually, and as the ) Administrator of the Estate ) of Steven Amos Williams, ) deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) a Corporation; et al., ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv980-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant to the notice of dismissal (doc. no. 32), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, and the claims against it, are dismissed without prejudice. The court Transportation, assumes d/b/a Two that Men and defendant a Truck, Eberly has no objection to the dismissal; however, if it does, it must Dockets.Justia.com file the objection within seven days from the date of this judgment. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Eberly Transportation, d/b/a Two Men and a Truck, is terminated as a main defendant. Said party is still in this case as a crossclaim defendant. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 6th day of January, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.