Dixon v. Jones, et al (INMATE1), No. 3:2011cv00323 - Document 67 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Dfts, and against the Plf, Michael James Dixon, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Costs are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/9/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

Download PDF
Dixon v. Jones, et al (INMATE1) Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL JAMES DIXON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. JAY JONES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 3:11cv-323-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, and against the Plaintiff, Michael James Dixon, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 9th day of December, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.