Allen v. Cypress Village, LTD et al (MAG+), No. 3:2010cv00994 - Document 87 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: ORDERED as follows: 1) The 86 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Dfts' Oral Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and 3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Ms. Allen's abandonment of her claims, failure to comply with the orders of this court, and failure to prosecute this action; A separate final judgment will be issued. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/27/2012. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allen v. Cypress Village, LTD et al (MAG+) Doc. 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHARISSE D. ALLEN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CYPRESS VILLAGE, LTD., et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 3:10-CV-994-WKW [WO] ORDER On July 11, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation. (Doc. # 86.) No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 86) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ oral motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Ms. Allen’s abandonment of her claims, failure to comply with the orders of this court, and failure to prosecute this action. A separate final judgment will be issued. DONE this 27th day of July, 2012. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
