Belton v. Ramsey (MAG+), No. 3:2010cv00814 - Document 129 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Marilyn Belton's 126 Objections are overruled; (2) The magistrate judge's 125 Recommendations is adopted; (3) Judgment is entered in favor of dft Lalanya A lmesha Ramsey and against plf Marilyn Belton, with plf Belton taking nothing by her complaint against dft Ramsey; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf Belton, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on th e civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/15/2012. (furn: Calendar, ag)(term: Jury Selection and Jury Trial for 11/26/2012) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Belton v. Ramsey (MAG+) Doc. 129 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION MARILYN BELTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. LALANYA ALMESHA RAMSEY Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv814-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Marilyn Belton’s objections (doc. no. 126) are overruled. (2) The magistrate judge’s recommendations (doc. no. 125) is adopted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Lalanya Almesha Ramsey and against plaintiff Marilyn Belton, with plaintiff Belton taking nothing by her complaint against defendant Ramsey. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Belton, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 15th day of November, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.