Coggins v. Tallapoosa County (MAG+), No. 3:2010cv00073 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's objections 5 are overruled; The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation 4 is adopted; that this lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915; that it is further ORDERED that costs are taxed agains t plaintiff, for which execution may issue; that the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 2/19/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coggins v. Tallapoosa County (MAG+) Doc. 7 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION GENE COGGINS, Plaintiff, v. TALLAPOOSA COUNTY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv73-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 5) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
