Duckworth v. Hetzell et al (INMATE 1), No. 3:2010cv00072 - Document 32 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's 30 Objections are overruled. (2) The 29 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted. (3) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is time-barred. It is fu rther ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/15/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
Duckworth v. Hetzell et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 32 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM D. DUCKWORTH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) GARY HETZEL, Warden, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv72-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 30) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 15th day of February, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.