-SRW Kintz v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 3:2009cv01033 - Document 53 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT; that (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. ("UPS") and against Plaintiff Cheri J. Kintz ("Kintz"). (2) It is further ORDERED that costs are hereby TAXED against Kintz and in favo r of UPS, for which execution may issue. (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/7/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-SRW Kintz v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHERI J. KINTZ, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. Defendant. CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1033-MEF (WO-DO NOT PUBLISH) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior orders of the Court it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) and against Plaintiff Cheri J. Kintz (“Kintz”). (2) It is further ORDERED that costs are hereby TAXED against Kintz and in favor of UPS, for which execution may issue. (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and close this file. Done this the 7 th day of January, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
