-CSC Ducker v. Astrue, No. 3:2009cv00973 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 18 memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that the decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and this case is remanded to defendant Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration and proceedings consistent with the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/25/11. (Furnished to SSA Office of Hearings & Appeals and SSA Chief Judge.) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
-CSC Ducker v. Astrue Doc. 19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM M. DUCKER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv973-MHT (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that the decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and this case is remanded to defendant Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration and proceedings consistent with the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this 25th day of March 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.