Nunn v. United States of America (INMATE3), No. 3:2009cv00690 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) the petitioner's 4 objections are overruled; (2) the U. S. Magistrate Judge's 2 Recommendation is adopted; (3) the 28 USC 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice. Ordered that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The Clerk of court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/28/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(sl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Nunn v. United States of America (INMATE3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TYRONE NUNN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv690-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 4) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 2) is adopted. (3) The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied without prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
