Alexander v. Evening Shade Inc., et al., No. 3:2009cv00605 - Document 64 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 40 motion to strike exhibits K & L, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/10/10. (djy, )
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION LOUIE ALEXANDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) EVENING SHADE INC., d/b/a ) PENNY PROFFIT CLEANERS, and ) RICK HADDOCK, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv605-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The Evening case Shade is now Inc., before doing the court business as on defendants Penny Proffit Cleaners, and Rick Haddock s motion to strike exhibits K and L , affidavits of plaintiff Louie Alexander s Penny Profit co-workers, which were submitted opposition to the motion for summary judgment. ORDERED that the motion (doc. no. 40) is denied. *** in It is Defendants assert that the exhibits fail to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e), which requires that affidavits submitted on summary judgment be made on personal knowledge ... and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated. They state that the employee affidavits do not contain affirmations that the affiants were sworn and that the information contained within ... is true and accurate to the best of the affiant[s ] Furthermore, knowledge. they contend that Mot. both (Doc. No. 40). documents were improperly notarized, as the affiants failed to appear personally before the notary republic. In response to defendants objections, Alexander submitted, and the court granted, a motion to substitute exhibits K and L with exhibits K-2 and L-2, affidavits that contain testimony identical to that in the original exhibits, but which are prepared in accordance with Fed. 2 R. Civ. P. 56. Consequently, the court finds defendants objections to exhibits K and L are now moot. DONE, this the 10th of August, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE