Hughley v. United States of America (INMATE3), No. 3:2009cv00296 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Petitioner's 17 Objections are overruled; (2) The 16 United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is adopted; and (3) The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied as further set out. It is further ORD ERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/23/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hughley v. United States of America (INMATE3) Doc. 19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION JOHNNY HUGHLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09cv296-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 17) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied because the required permission Dockets.Justia.com has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 23rd day of November, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
