Ellis v. Riley-Pelfrey et al (INMATE1) (DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY), No. 3:2007cv00920 - Document 60 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT; it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: (1) Plf William Lanier Ellis, Sr.'s 42 Motion To Dismiss is granted and dfts Tina Riley-Pelfrey (a nurse), Danny Bussey and John Stihl (correctional officers), and Loetta Holland (identified as a "Jail Administrator" in the complaint) and the claims against them are dismissed; (2) Dft Spud Warr's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and summary judgment is entered in favor of dft Warr and against plf Ellis, with plf Ellis taking nothing by his complaint as to said dft; (3) Costs are taxed against plf Ellis, for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/10/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
Ellis v. Riley-Pelfrey et al (INMATE1) (DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY) Doc. 60 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM LANIER ELLIS, SR., #259380, Plaintiff, v. TINA RILEY-PELFREY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07cv920-MHT (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: (1) Plaintiff William Lanier Ellis, Sr.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 42) is granted and defendants Tina Riley-Pelfrey (a nurse), Danny Bussey and John Stihl (correctional officers), and Loetta Holland (identified as a “Jail Administrator” in the complaint) and the claims against them are dismissed. (2) Defendant Spud Warr’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 39) is granted and summary judgment is entered in favor of defendant Warr and against plaintiff Ellis, with plaintiff Ellis taking nothing by his complaint as to said defendant. (3) Costs are taxed against plaintiff Ellis, for which execution may issue. This case is now closed. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 10th day of August, 2010. /s/ MYRON H. THOMPSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE