Ray et al v. Ford Motor Company, No. 3:2007cv00175 - Document 120 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to FRCP 54(b) in favor of Third Party Defendant, Admiral Tool & Manufacturing Company, and against the Third Party Plaintiff, Visteon Corporation, on all third party claims, and Visteon's claims against Admiral Tool are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/27/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )(furn: yg hc elna) (term: Ptl Cnf 08/07/2009 & JT 08/31/2009)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ray et al v. Ford Motor Company Doc. 120 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MEREDITH CHADWICK RAY and PHILLIP RAY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, at al. Defendants. Civil Action No.: 3:07cv175-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Order entered on this date, and the court finding that there is no just reason for delay, Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) in favor of Third Party Defendant, Admiral Tool & Manufacturing Company, and against the Third Party Plaintiff, Visteon Corporation, on all third party claims, and Visteon’s claims against Admiral Tool are DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against Visteon Corporation. Done this 27th day of April, 2009. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
