Smitherman v. Chilton County Judicial System et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2022cv00295 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis as ordered by the Court; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/2/2022. (am, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smitherman v. Chilton County Judicial System et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 5 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JASON SMITHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CHILTON COUNTY JUD. SYSM., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 2:22-cv-295-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On July 7, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 4) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis as ordered by the Court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 2nd day of August, 2022. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
