Jones v. Anthony et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2021cv00618 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION: The Court concludes that the objections (Doc. 5 ) should be OVERRULED and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 4 ) ADOPTED. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/18/2021. (cwl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jones v. Anthony et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION FREDERICK DWIGHT JONES, AIS #157783, Plaintiff, v. TERRY ANTHONY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:21-CV-618-WHA-CSC ) ) ) ) OPINION Now before the Court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that recommends Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii). Doc. 4. Plaintiff has filed objections. Doc. 5. Based upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds the Recommendation adequately addresses and properly rejects the grounds for Plaintiff’s objections without need for further elaboration and that the objections lack merit. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the objections (Doc. 5) should be OVERRULED and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 4) ADOPTED. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Done, this 18th day of October 2021. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
