Adams v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (MAG+), No. 2:2021cv00416 - Document 31 (M.D. Ala. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 30 ) is ADOPTED. 2) The Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. 26 ) is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a dismissal with prejudice b ut DENIED to the extent that it seeks taxation of costs. 3) The Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4) No costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. 5) This case is DISMISSED. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/20/2022. (cwl, )

Download PDF
Adams v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (MAG+) Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TIMMY EARL ADAMS, Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:21-cv-416-ECM MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On October 4, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 30) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 30) is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 26) is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a dismissal with prejudice but DENIED to the extent that it seeks taxation of costs. 3. The Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. No costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. 5. This case is DISMISSED. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 20th day of October, 2022. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.