Rand v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2020cv00783 - Document 44 (M.D. Ala. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The 42 objections are overruled; (2) The 41 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The 1 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/23/2021. (bes, )

Download PDF
Rand v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 44 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL T. RAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DEMETRIUS SANDERS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20cv783-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary defendant injunction correctional home-confinement status. seeking an officials order that transfer him the to This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that injunction be plaintiff’s denied. motion Also for before the preliminary court plaintiff’s objections to the recommendation. are Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the recommendation adopted. *** Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objections (Doc. 42) are overruled. (2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 41) is adopted. (3) The motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 23rd day of April, 2021. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.