Cotton v. Butler et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2020cv00642 - Document 46 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) the Plaintiff's 44 objections are OVERRULED; 2) the 41 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) the 6 motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED; and 4) this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 2/23/2021. (amf, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cotton v. Butler et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LARRY COTTON, AIS # 135533, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BUTLER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:20-cv-642-ECM ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Now pending before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 41) which recommends that the Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (doc. 6) be denied. On January 7, 2021, the Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation. (Doc. 44). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, for the reasons as stated and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. the Plaintiff’s objections (doc. 44) are OVERRULED; 2. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 41) is ADOPTED; 3. the motion for a preliminary injunction (doc. 6) is DENIED; and 4. this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 23rd day of February 2021. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
