Washington v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2020cv00544 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the Court;A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/18/2020. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Washington v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 5 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SAMUEL WASHINGTON, JR., # 201179, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, ALABAMA DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:20-cv-544-ECM OPINION and ORDER On October 15, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 4) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the Court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 18th day of December, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
