Taylor v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2020cv00527 - Document 31 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The 27 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) The 24 motion for class certification is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/22/2021. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Taylor v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 31 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JASON TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Alabama ) Department of Corrections ) Commissioner, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20cv527-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit classification process Department Corrections against of male prisoners minimum-community contending utilized in custody by the unlawfully terms status of that Alabama discriminates eligibility and the work for release. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that motion for class certification be denied. objections to the recommendation. plaintiff’s There are no Upon an independent Dockets.Justia.com and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 27) is adopted. (2) The motion for class certification (Doc. 24) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 22nd day of February, 2021. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
