Martin v. Sheppard (INMATE 1), No. 2:2020cv00502 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failure to pay the partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the Court; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/8/2020. (am, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Martin v. Sheppard (INMATE 1) Doc. 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL RASHAD MARTIN, #320891, Plaintiff, v. RONNIE T. SHEPPARD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:20-cv-502-ECM OPINION and ORDER On September 16, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 9) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the Court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 8th day of October, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
