Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2020cv00370 - Document 4 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED that as follows: 1) the 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2 ) is DENIED; 3) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to pay the requisite filing and administrative fees upon initiation of this case. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/14/2020. (cwl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 4 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GREGORY KENNETH LEE, #184070, Plaintiff, v. SGT. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:20-cv-370-ECM (WO) OPINION and ORDER On June 4, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 3) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that as follows: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED; 3. this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the requisite filing and administrative fees upon initiation of this case. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 14th day of July, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
