Lee v. Turman et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2019cv00660 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: On March 14, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that the Petitioners habeas petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (doc. 13 ) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent revi ew of the file, upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 4/11/2022. (cwl, )

Download PDF
Lee v. Turman et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL TYSON LEE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. BLAKE TURMAN, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:19-cv-660-ECM (WO) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On March 14, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that the Petitioner’s habeas petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (doc. 13) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file, upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Done this 11th day of April, 2022. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.