Tyus v. Crow et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2019cv00491 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: On August 30, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that the Petitioners habeas petition be dismissed with prejudice (doc. 9 ) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the f ile, upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to allow the Petitioner to exhaust his available state remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/10/2019. (kh, )

Download PDF
Tyus v. Crow et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MARTAVIUS JAMARQUIS TYUS, AIS # 315479, Petitioner, v. JOHN CROW, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:19-cv-491-ECM (WO) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On August 30, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that the Petitioner’s habeas petition be dismissed with prejudice (doc. 9) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file, upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to allow the Petitioner to exhaust his available state remedies. Done this 10th day of October, 2019. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.