McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2019cv00111 - Document 73 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 72 ) is adopted. (2) Petitioner' motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (doc. no. 66 ) is denied. This case remains closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/19/2020. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 73 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES McCONICO, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & ) PAROLE, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19cv111-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the court on the United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the court deny petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). under Petitioner’s motion challenges this court’s July 2019 dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: Dockets.Justia.com (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 72) is adopted. (2) Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (doc. no. 66) is denied. This case remains closed. DONE, this the 19th day of October, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
