Maxwell v. Rahming et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2018cv00757 - Document 70 (M.D. Ala. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/11/2021. (am, )

Download PDF
Maxwell v. Rahming et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 70 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TRACY MAXWELL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DR. W. RAHMING [M.D.], et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv757-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that he was denied adequate medical care for chest incarcerated at pain Kilby and a heart Correctional blockage while Facility. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted with prejudice to the extent they seek dismissal of this case due to plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an institutional administrative remedy prior to filing suit. There are no After objections to the recommendation. an Dockets.Justia.com independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 11th day of June, 2021. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.