Thomas v. Myers et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2018cv00507 - Document 29 (M.D. Ala. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 22 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; 2) The 10 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/12/2018. (alm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thomas v. Myers et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 29 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION CLISTOPHER L. THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN WALTER MYERS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv507-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction seeking an order prohibiting the use of the segregation cells at Easterling Correctional Facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. There are no objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: Dockets.Justia.com (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 22) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 10) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 12th day of July, 2018. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
