Blocker v. Woods et al(INMATE 3), No. 2:2018cv00188 - Document 42 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 41 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failures to complywith the orders of the Court and to prosecute this action; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 3/10/2021. (amf, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blocker v. Woods et al(INMATE 3) Doc. 42 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TYRONE BLOCKER, Reg. No. 17221-171, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WALTER WOODS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:18-cv-188-ECM (WO) OPINION and ORDER On February 18, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 41) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failures to comply with the orders of the Court and to prosecute this action. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 10th day of March, 2021. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
