Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2018cv00160 - Document 58 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER directing that: (1) the 57 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the defs' 14 & 40 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) costs are taxed against plf for which execution may issue; a separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 3/10/2021. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID BARTHOLOMEW CLARK, AIS # 194417, Plaintiff, v. KARLA JONES, WARDEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:18-cv-160-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On February 17, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 57). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (doc. 57) is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docs. 14 and 40) are GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue. A separate Judgment will be entered. DONE this 10th day of March, 2021. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
