Alverson v. Mills et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2018cv00061 - Document 86 (M.D. Ala. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 81 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 80 ) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/24/2020. (kh, )

Download PDF
Alverson v. Mills et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 86 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY ALVERSON, Plaintiff, v. LORENZO MILLS, in his individual and official capacity, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv61-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this defendant correctional lawsuit officers contending and that officials, the in retaliation for his litigation activities, transferred him to Easterling Correctional Facility and assign him to Staton Correctional Facility. 2020, he filed his second motion for did not In March preliminary injunction, seeking a transfer to a less violent dorm and to Staton Correctional Facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the motion for preliminary Dockets.Justia.com injunction be denied. recommendation. of the There are no objections to the Upon an independent and de novo review record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. *** Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 81) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 80) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 24th day of April, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.