Alverson v. Mills et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2018cv00061 - Document 82 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 72 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 71 ) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/23/2020. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Alverson v. Mills et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 82 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY ALVERSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. LORENZO MILLS, in his individual and official capacity, at al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv61-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this defendant correctional lawsuit officers contending and that officials, the in retaliation for his litigation activities, transferred him to Easterling assign him February to 2020, Correctional Staton he Facility Correctional filed a motion and did Facility. for not In preliminary injunction seeking a prompt transfer from his current facility to a less violent Level IV facility. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the motion for Dockets.Justia.com preliminary injunction be denied. objections to the recommendation. There are no Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. *** Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 72) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 71) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 23rd day of March, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
