Howard v. Anglin et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2017cv00818 - Document 42 (M.D. Ala. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/25/2021. (amf, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Howard v. Anglin et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 42 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRANDON HOWARD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. J. ANGLIN, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv818-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit asserting that the defendant correctional officers subjected him to excessive force. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted as to plaintiff’s claims for monetary relief against defendants in their official capacities; the motions be denied as to plaintiff’s claims that for monetary relief against defendants in their individual capacities, and as to plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief against defendants in their official and Dockets.Justia.com individual capacities; and that this case be set for trial on plaintiff's surviving claim of excessive force against defendants individual for capacities monetary and for damages in prospective their injunctive relief from them in both their individual and official capacities. There recommendation. review of the are After record, an the no objections independent court and concludes to the de novo that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment and other appropriate orders will be entered. DONE, this the 25th day of January, 2021. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
