Baisden v. Corizon LLC et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2017cv00627 - Document 43 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows that: 1) the 39 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) the Defs' motion to dismiss (doc. 13 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the Defs seek dismissal of this case due to the Plf' ;s failure to properly exhaust an institutional remedy prior to filing suit; 3) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a). A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/17/2020. (cwl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baisden v. Corizon LLC et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 43 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LARRY ROGER BAISDEN, II, #298382, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:17-cv-627-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On June 25, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 39) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows that: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 13) is GRANTED to the extent that the Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the Plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an institutional remedy prior to filing suit; 3. this case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 17th day of July, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
