Garrett v. United States Marshal Service et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2017cv00470 - Document 104 (M.D. Ala. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendations (docs. 102 and 103 ) are ADOPTED. 2. The Plf's amended complaint against Def United States Marshals Service (doc. 28 ) is DISMISSED, and Def United States Marshals Service is TERMINATED as a party in this action. 3. The Defs' motion for summary judgment (doc. 50 ) is GRANTED. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against Plf for which execution may issue. A separate Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 3/30/2021. (cwl, )

Download PDF
Garrett v. United States Marshal Service et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 104 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LARRY DEAN GARRETT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:17-cv-470-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 9 and March 10, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed Recommendations in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Docs. 102 and 103). After an independent review of the record, upon consideration of the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations (docs. 102 and 103) are ADOPTED. 2. The Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendant United States Marshals Service (doc. 28) is DISMISSED, and Defendant United States Marshals Service is TERMINATED as a party in this action. 3. The Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 50) is GRANTED. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue A separate Judgment will be entered. Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 30th day of March, 2021. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.