Clark v. Hood et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2017cv00429 - Document 36 (M.D. Ala. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: On July 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 35 ) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as fo llows that: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4. costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/24/2020. (dmn, ) Modified on 8/24/2020 to include "and Order" text. (dmn, )

Download PDF
Clark v. Hood et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 36 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL BARTHOLOMEW CLARK, # 184417, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA HOOD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:17-cv-429-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On July 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 35) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows that: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4. costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 24th day of August, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.