Henderson v. Lambert et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2017cv00268 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2017)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff Solomon Ladanial Hendersons action against Defendants Sgt. Lambert, Officer Foster, Officer Thomas, Offi cer Parker, Roeisha Butler, and Michael Strickland is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/26/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
Henderson v. Lambert et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SOLOMON LADANIEL HENDERSON, # 250 233, Plaintiff, v. SGT. LAMBERT, OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER THOMAS, OFFICER PARKER, ROEISHA BUTLER, and MICHAEL STRICKLAND, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:17-CV-268-WKW [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff Solomon Ladanial Henderson’s action against Defendants Sgt. Lambert, Officer Foster, Officer Thomas, Officer Parker, Roeisha Butler, and Michael Strickland is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 26th day of July, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.